| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| do we need a jury, that desides, if someone gets points back |
| yes |
|
81% |
[ 9 ] |
| no |
|
18% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 11 |
|
| Author |
Message |
admin
Board Admin
Joined: 09 Jan 2002
Posts: 2938
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:45 pm Post subject: a score police jury |
|
|
we could install a jury here in the forum, that desides if someone has to get points back, cause he lost score, cause he suffered from a bug.
this sometimes happens, for example, the mysterious "ghost plague ship"-bug
what do you think? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Robert Roy
Vice Admiral
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 525
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1 Admin, thx for doing this. You earned returning the favour big time 
2 IF points should be restored, there should be no exceptions.
- ALL people that can prove they lost points DIRECTLY due to a bug, and it has to be a bug that can be checked by admins/multihunters in the BR histories, then points should be restored.
- So if you CAN't prove it, or if you lost points due to losing certain ships in the previous bugged battle ( indirect loss, and no knowledge how much should be restored ), then you won't get your points back.
_________________
Nulla poena sine lege.. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:19 pm Post subject: Re: a score police jury |
|
|
| admin wrote: | we could install a jury here in the forum, that desides if someone has to get points back, cause he lost score, cause he suffered from a bug.
this sometimes happens, for example, the mysterious "ghost plague ship"-bug
what do you think? |
First of all, i know you do this for free and we apreciate that, i have defended this game everywhere.
This could be done so much far in the past...Anyway you and Spyder can always say that points are hardly given back. but you never explain why?
Why cant we have our points back? Where is problem? The player who lost points and get more is happy, the player that won more pts could be a noob and you are giving him a wrong impression about how the ships works and why an experimented player will complain about taking out his points when he didnt really deserved them? He knew he won pts by a bug.
So there shouldnt be an exception...just a team that confirm if there was somekind of bug and give everyone his points back.
Of course this team(i offer my self to be one) has to be very large, so we have different minds and the opinion has to be unanime.
Well thats how i say i am agree with this idea, but everyone should get his points back |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Robert Roy
Vice Admiral
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 525
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:36 pm Post subject: Re: a score police jury |
|
|
| Rubens wrote: | | So there shouldnt be an exception... |
Just what I said. We agree, wow that doesn't happen much ingame
| Rubens wrote: | just a team that confirm if there was somekind of bug and give everyone his points back.
Of course this team(i offer my self to be one) has to be very large, so we have different minds and the opinion has to be unanime. |
Well why make another new team? There allready is a multi-hunter team, that is a team with dedicated players. People that would discuss about this should be the same sort of players. So just give them these point restoring abilities, and expand the group for making it more versatile and capable of doing this job.
Just hope this will be implemented soon  I love it
_________________
Nulla poena sine lege.. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I dont love it because is not evolution, its just needed...Now is time to wait |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Knight of Truth
Admiral
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 2011
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a guy called Archealon or something like that, he wrote several topics, about how he defeated the Travelers, gaining 999999 points, and if i remember correctly, admin took those pints away saying that it was a bug, Archealon shpuld be in th #1 spot, he defeated the travvelers and gained points in doing so, if anyone should get points back, it should be him.
_________________
[img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]
| MicroJak wrote: |
For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!! |
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Connor McCloud
Admiral
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 916
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
@ Rubens , yes i saw him because he is in top 10 . But it suprised me that someone without even a relative score ( <10%) have so much points . In my opinion you can't score that much without cheating (multy) .so i looked in his BR's and saw the score isn't gained Legal
BTW IF SOMEONE HAS HIS (Silas) COORDS pm ME 
Greetz Connor 
_________________
Greetz Connor
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
DavAlan
Admiral
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 778
Location: Palo Alto, California
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Connor McCloud wrote: | BTW IF SOMEONE HAS HIS (Silas) COORDS pm ME
Greetz Connor |
Or pm me, lol, either the guy is a multi or the ultimate noob. I want a battle either way
_________________
"Destruction leads to a very rough road
But it also breeds creation
And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar
They are just another good vibration
And tidal waves couldn't save the world
From Californication"
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlUKcNNmywk
___________________________________
https://www.facebook.com/david.brass.524 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Knight of Truth
Admiral
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 2011
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
he beat the travvelers, he didnt multi. and that was some time ago.
See it sais here:
| Quote: | yours: 13 ships
class 1:
11 fighters (1/1, 1 MP)
2 bounty hunters (0/1, 4 MP)
enemy: 1 ship
class 4:
1 apostate sphere (10000/50000, 1000000 MP)
- click here to see the complete battlereport -
summary:
your losses:
class 1:
1 fighter
enemy losses:
class 4:
1 apostate sphere
score: 999999
|
It was class 4!!!
_________________
[img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]
| MicroJak wrote: |
For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!! |
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Plz ignore him.
Well we know how busy is the admin. If he let me be a multihunter or something like that i will try to find the problem if there is one.
Remember kame started like that and he went down.
Well i havent seen him again but i remember 1 player with 3 c4 and 2 c3 etc.
Raen of Archengelion...(Wasnt he at the top 10?) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
kamekaze6
Admiral
Joined: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 1312
Location: Malta
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Remember kame started like that and he went down.
|
excuse me... went down?? i m inactive... can t log in before 6 pm apart from the odd free lesson at school.
_________________
STFU N00B!!!!111!1!
Click!! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You started with a relative score of 130k and you got just 100k in less than a week. I dont think therefore was inactiveness.
Of course after that you invented a war that never existed and you got inactive and your relative is very low.
I dont think that it is something to discuss about I am just saying that after someone appear in the top ten with a great relative goes down. As rob and osiris etc. But the problem is that everybody seems to make that score fairly but this player has won many points in a suspictious way, hope we reach the true and know if he is a multi or if he isnt, but as somebody hates a player with a higher score by easy battles, now everybody has his coords and he will go down.
Sorry if you felt offended.
Greetings to all the ppl with good batlles, Rubens |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
