View previous topic :: View next topic |
May 1 person alliance exist? |
Yes |
|
47% |
[ 8 ] |
No |
|
52% |
[ 9 ] |
|
Total Votes : 17 |
|
Author |
Message |
JaM Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Posts: 1300
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2003 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why are there so many 1 member alliance, it isn't so hard to find new members. Can't a 1 member alliance be (discontinued?) when they haven't a new member in a week?
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
wizz 2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Sep 2002 Posts: 151
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2003 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
whats your problem with 1member-alliances???
(with giving no reason its like:
"why are there some many alliances starting with an 'a'- please ban them all" )
i dont see them doing harm. let those guys have fun on their own if they arent able to find friends.
i dont have problems with 1member-alliances.
there are so many single players maybe some of them just to have an alliance or are still waiting for members. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Neo 2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 25 May 2003 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2003 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and some of them are better than full alliances lol - take a look at box of pandora |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Bogart Captain
Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 144 Location: Round Three
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed.
_________________ Col.(ret.) Bogart. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
SirTaz 1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 07 Jun 2002 Posts: 247 Location: U.S.A in the state of Florida
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah its called a army of One |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
darklim Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003 Posts: 1154 Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some players plays alone and don't create a alliance is that the same thing you say?
_________________ The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
JaM Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Posts: 1300
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, just finding it hard to believe that an alliance can have 1 member.
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
wizz 2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Sep 2002 Posts: 151
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
its like a one-man-band:
you dont need a bunch of ppl to make music |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Achilles 1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 333 Location: Wisconsin-USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can't a one man alliance still use a mobile TWG?
That's benefit enough to make an alliance with yourself. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
admin Board Admin
Joined: 09 Jan 2002 Posts: 2938
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think we should make the mTWG available only to alliances with at least 2 members |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
peace of love 1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 306
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
@admin && JaM:
i allways thought spacetrace were a game where everyone could play the way he likes too (besides of cheating and swearing of course).
i dont like the idea of additional rules against those one-player-alliances. why shouldnt they profit like any other alliance?
if they are a nuisance to somebody it should not be too difficult to attack them and tell them this way that its better to join a larger alliance.
but that brings me to the point that i have more problems with larger alliances than with small ones cause they often threat and terrorize single players and small alliances at free will.
if the rule is changed as proposed, the free spirit and self-equalation of the game will be hurt. so in that case i claim that in addition alliances cant be stronger than 6 members anymore... |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
admin Board Admin
Joined: 09 Jan 2002 Posts: 2938
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
we will leave the mTWG like it is for now.
but lets think about a better solution |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Bogart Captain
Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 144 Location: Round Three
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why search for a solution when there isnt a problem, just making work for yourself I think!!!
_________________ Col.(ret.) Bogart. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
admin Board Admin
Joined: 09 Jan 2002 Posts: 2938
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes, maybe it is just a naming-problem:
an alliance with one member is no alliance, so we should call them alliances-in-formation maybe? |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
JaM Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Posts: 1300
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why don't you give everyone a mTWG so that they don't have to set up an alliance. But if they join an alliance they would lose the mTWG (except if they are a CoW)
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Bogart Captain
Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 144 Location: Round Three
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One mtg per alliance is plenty. A large alliance with 20 mtg would be unbalanced I think. And unlawful also.
_________________ Col.(ret.) Bogart. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
wizz 2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Sep 2002 Posts: 151
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i dont like unlawful things. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
BladeTech Admiral
Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 1591
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
neither does law and order |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
JaM Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Posts: 1300
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2003-06-03 15:40, JaM wrote:
Why don't you give everyone a mTWG so that they don't have to set up an alliance. But if they join an alliance they would lose the mTWG (except if they are a CoW)
|
So 1 alliance get 1 mTWG and if you're NOT in an alliance you get also 1. This way you don't have to make an alliance for a mTWG
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
BladeTech Admiral
Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 1591
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
might as well just increase the speed of the mothership then |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
|