1 member alliances

[JaM]

Why are there so many 1 member alliance, it isn't so hard to find new members. Can't a 1 member alliance be (discontinued?) when they haven't a new member in a week?

[wizz]

whats your problem with 1member-alliances???
(with giving no reason its like:
"why are there some many alliances starting with an 'a'- please ban them all" )

i dont see them doing harm. let those guys have fun on their own if they arent able to find friends.

i dont have problems with 1member-alliances.
there are so many single players maybe some of them just to have an alliance or are still waiting for members.

[Neo]

and some of them are better than full alliances lol - take a look at box of pandora

[Bogart]

Indeed.

_________________
Col.(ret.) Bogart.

[SirTaz]

Yeah its called a army of One

[darklim]

Some players plays alone and don't create a alliance is that the same thing you say?

_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance

[JaM]

No, just finding it hard to believe that an alliance can have 1 member.

[wizz]

its like a one-man-band:

you dont need a bunch of ppl to make music

[Achilles]

Can't a one man alliance still use a mobile TWG?

That's benefit enough to make an alliance with yourself.

[admin]

i think we should make the mTWG available only to alliances with at least 2 members

[peace of love]

@admin && JaM:

i allways thought spacetrace were a game where everyone could play the way he likes too (besides of cheating and swearing of course).

i dont like the idea of additional rules against those one-player-alliances. why shouldnt they profit like any other alliance?

if they are a nuisance to somebody it should not be too difficult to attack them and tell them this way that its better to join a larger alliance.

but that brings me to the point that i have more problems with larger alliances than with small ones cause they often threat and terrorize single players and small alliances at free will.

if the rule is changed as proposed, the free spirit and self-equalation of the game will be hurt. so in that case i claim that in addition alliances cant be stronger than 6 members anymore...

[admin]

we will leave the mTWG like it is for now.
but lets think about a better solution

[Bogart]

Why search for a solution when there isnt a problem, just making work for yourself I think!!!

_________________
Col.(ret.) Bogart.

[admin]

yes, maybe it is just a naming-problem:
an alliance with one member is no alliance, so we should call them alliances-in-formation maybe?

[JaM]

Why don't you give everyone a mTWG so that they don't have to set up an alliance. But if they join an alliance they would lose the mTWG (except if they are a CoW)

[Bogart]

One mtg per alliance is plenty. A large alliance with 20 mtg would be unbalanced I think. And unlawful also.

_________________
Col.(ret.) Bogart.

[wizz]

i dont like unlawful things.

[BladeTech]

neither does law and order

[JaM]

[BladeTech]

might as well just increase the speed of the mothership then